Answer:
Kings and lords would view this statement as a very aggressive one against their kingdoms if they were not contextualized.
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are that in the first place if the kings and lords who heard this statement didn't have the religious context to understand it, they would feel assaulted or threatened because they would take it literally instead of metaphorical. That is the reason why we have to contextualize our public before we tell share our ideas with them.
Answer: It effects countries after they've been decolonized as it's still taking resources away from them after leaving the control of the country up to them.
Explanation: (Hope this helps that's what I got from my History 12 course.)
That would be Adolf Hitler, as stated in this source (History.com) "Hitler appointed a new Nazi government, and on March 13 the Anschluss was proclaimed. Austria existed as a federal state of Germany until the end of World War II, when the Allied powers declared the Anschluss void and reestablished an independent Austria."
Answer:
A There are more Native American tribes today than in the 16th century.
B There are fewer Native American tribes today than in the 16th century.
C There are the same number of Native American tribes today as in the 16th century.
D It is unclear how the number of Native American tribes has changed.
Explanation:
Answer:
Francis Drake was an English privateer in the service of the Crown of England who served his nation during the wars against Spain in the late 1500s. Drake participated in numerous battles for the English navy, but especially gained his fame as a privateer who sabotaged numerous ships of the Spanish merchant marine causing serious economic and material losses to the Kingdom of Spain. Since Spain did not recognize the figure of the corsair, he was classified as a pirate by the Iberian authorities, which exposed him to eventual death penalties if captured. The English crown, on the other hand, legally recognized him as a privateer and endorsed his actions, which generated an ethical and ideological conflict within the war that both nations had with each other, at a time when formalities and the value of the word had a special significance even in war conflicts.