Answer:reversed and remanded
Explanation:
- In the drunk driving case
- judge discovered and concluded that they had no obligation to volunteer helping the person whose injury they were not responsible for and did not have an hand or part that they played in causing such an injury.
Plaintiff appealed
- Appellate or appeal court established that there was enough evidence for a jury to find defendants liable for negligence because they had aided & abetted Mairs' wrongful post-accident conduct by not acting reasonably under the circumstances to assist Podias, such as calling 911.
They should have foreseen this danger because:
(1) there is a risk of harm that may result from leaving lying in the middle of the road knowing that someone is incapable of helping themselves.
(2) failure of defendants to call for help or take measures that will help the plaintiff.
(3) if one is aware of all the risks and damage that will result from their inability to take action that will help they are liable for the harm caused .
Reversed means that a decision taken by the lower court is not accepted by a higher court .
Remanded means the higher court send back the case that they reject to the lower court to be continued further.
D, the never want a central government with too much power
Answer: Interference
Explanation:
Interference theory is defined as the theory about forgetting things or events due to striving of two memories against one another to create a competing situation.It usually tends to restrict new information or any past events to be remembered or getting retrieved in mind.
There are two types of interference that take place in mind -retroactive interference and proactive interference. Retroactive interference does not retrieval of old memory through intervening with new information.Proactive interference block new information with help of old memories.
Answer:
ठीक छ, मलाई लाग्छ कि त्यहाँ छ
Explanation:
