Answer:
HDI refers to Human Development Index and it’s a measure of the key elements and areas of how citizens of the country develop. These can be measured through their average income, health care etc.
China- 0.761 85th
USA - 0.926 17th
Japan- 0.919 19th
UK- 0.932 13th
Saudi Arabia- 0.854 40th
Iraq- 0.674 123rd
No it is not okay because being in a gang is horrible and you can never get out and you can get killed and do bad things that they force you too like rob or fight and you will get into some promblems with the police and people and then end up in jail being in a gang is so bad
Answer:
psychomotor abilities
Explanation:
Psychomotor ability: In psychology, the term "psychomotor ability" is determined as an individual who possesses a variety of range of different actions that involves the physical movement that is being associated with "conscious" cognitive processing". According to psychologists, it is being measured by speed or accuracy.
Psychomotor test: It is a test that "assesses" a participant's capability to get instructions and display motor responses.
In the question above, the given statement represents the psychomotor ability test.
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
The correct answer is the Sixth amendment.
The Sixth amendment of the Bill of Rights outlines that citizens have the right to an attorney if one cannot be afforded. Along with this, the sixth amendment also allows for the right to a fair and speedy trial and the right to a jury. All of these aspects make up an important part of our justice system.
In this excerpt, this Supreme Court justice is further solidifying this fact, as judge discusses how the court system puts "<span>great emphasis on procedural and substantive safeguards designed to assure fair trials before impartial tribunals."</span>
