Answer: Ousamequin decided to reach out to this group of settlers. It was a peril to his people and his ascendancy, but he was inclined to take it. Yet in the terminus, the people from the Mayflower would turn out to be just a diminutive part of a coming wave of European colonists that no one would be able to stop
Explanation: hope this helps
Banks lend this money to other customers, and they charge an interest on those loans, that will be the source of their profit. This is the main mechanism of the banking business models.
However, banks need to be cautious and keep a percentage of the deposits as liquid reserves (sometimes they are even forced by law to limit to a certain %), in case those customers who have deposited their money in checking and saving accounts want to withdraw some.
Answer: Look it up on gogle
Explanation:
On gogle
Rain is precipitation. But, I think you meant personification. Here are some examples of personification: He is as big as Godzilla! She is like a piece of broccoli, because she looks so sick. Personification compares something to another thing, and always has like or as.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C "design structured, rigid systems."
Explanation:
Unbending nature is the property of a structure that it doesn't twist or flex under an applied power. Something contrary to unbending nature is adaptability. In auxiliary inflexibility/regidity hypothesis, structures are shaped by assortments of items that are themselves unbending bodies, frequently expected to take basic geometric structures, for example, straight poles (line sections), with sets of articles associated by adaptable pivots. A structure is inflexible on the off chance that it can't flex; that is, if there is no persistent movement of the structure that safeguards the state of its unbending segments and the example of their associations at the pivots.
There are two basically various types of inflexibility or regidity. Limited or perceptible unbending nature implies that the structure won't flex, overlay, or curve by a positive sum. Minuscule unbending nature implies that the structure won't flex by even a sum that is too little to possibly be recognized even in principle. (In fact, that implies certain differential conditions have no nonzero arrangements.) The significance of limited inflexibility is self-evident, however microscopic unbending nature is additionally critical on the grounds that tiny adaptability in principle relates to genuine minute flexing, and subsequent crumbling of the structure.
