Answer:
1.
"The Dutch had no clear laws defining or regulating slavery in the early 1600s. It was unclear what rights enslaved people might have or how they might become free. In this ambiguous situation, Maria Van Angola and others used several strategies to secure rights and freedom for themselves and their families, including legal action, church membership, and control of land."
According to the text, it had no laws defining/regulating slavery at the time, making it unclear what rights they had. Even if they faced issues, they would still - in all technicality - be able to marry, own property, or petition for their own freedom.
2.
The benefits of owning land was an important part of being a freeholder. This means you would have small land grants and political rights freedom.
"Owning land meant more than a farm--it was a key to status as a “freeholder” with political rights. Listed among the original owners of small farms was a woman called “Marycke” who may have been Maria Van Angola. Over the next 19 years, 22 more emancipated people received small land grants as well, including Maria’s husband, Anthony Portuguese, in 1645."
Not sure if these are right!! Just a small guess, I'm not doing a lesson related to this. I just needed some points. Have a nice day, stay safe! :'}
Explanation:
Answer:
The Brahmaputra
Explanation:
The Brahmaputra river is the river that flows through the northern in north eastern regions of India.
The Brahmaputra river initiates from Tibet and enters Arunachal Pradesh, India which further flows through Assam, India and Bangladesh, emptying into the Bay of Bengal. It is the ninth largest river in the world.
Hence, the correct answer is "The Brahmaputra".
Answer:
Courtesy, is the correct answer.
Explanation:
An informal, unofficial, unwritten political custom whereby all the nominations for the federal judicial posts at the state level are not approved if they are engaged by a senator from the state in which the appointee will work, is known as the Senatorial courtesy. This same concept is applicable to the courts of appeal when the state senator opposes the nominee.
Answer:
D. There is a correlation between weight and classroom performance.
Explanation:
Students who weight more are more likely to live in a family which possess abundant resources. This mean that Weight could be an indicator of proper nutrition and wealth.
Growing up in a house with more wealth and proper nutrition will enhance the brain's performance and expose the students with additional learning activities outside school that could make the result of their study become better.
Answer:
B, to strengthen factions.
Explanation:
“As long as the reason of man continues fallible, and he is at liberty to exercise it, different opinions will be formed . . . The diversity in the faculties of men, from which the rights of property originate, is not less an insuperable obstacle to a uniformity of interests. The protection of these faculties is the first object of government. From the protection of different and unequal faculties of acquiring property, the possession of different degrees and kinds of property immediately results; and from the influence of these on the sentiments and views of the respective proprietors, ensues a division of the society into different interests and parties.”
We can eliminate A and C, the author seems to be in favor of them. They don't seem to be referring to Controlling the factions, so I think B is the best answer.
