Answer:
I am unaware of what this story was so I don't really know how to answer this but reading the title I'm going to assume the answer could be D
Explanation:
I'm saying D because i feel that it connects best too the little info you gave to answer this
with best regards I'm sorry if I'm wrong.
The answer is A. the tulips were bright slashes of color like a child's crayon drawing.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "A. super : frango." verso : torqueo :: <span>super : frango. These analogy is are all Latin words. Word analogies are pair of words that that has relationship to each. It may on meaning, spelling, pronunciation or whatever.</span>
Answer:
1
Odysseus's men forget about going
home after eating the lotus.
Temporary pleasures can make
people forget their long-term goals
2
Odysseus longs for home even when
happy with Calypso and Circe.
Exciting new places cannot replace
home's comforts
3
Odysseus has his men tie him so that
he will resist the call of the Sirens..
With strength and planning, one can
resist temptation.
Explanation:
1: Eating lotus was pleasure (temporary) for Odysseus' men because of which they forgot about going home (which was their long term goal.
2: Although Odysseus is happy and in good condition with Calypso and Crice, he still longs for home, which shows that no place can replace home's comfort.
3: Odysseus asks his men to tie him (strength and planning) so that he will resist the call of the sirens (resisting the temptation).
Answer:
"Did not make me condone cold-blooded murder," finished Rainsford stiffly.
"But they are men," said Rainsford hotly.
Explanation:
These sentences were said by Rainsford when he found out that Zaroff took pleasure in killing men for fun. Zaroff believes that this is just a different type of hunting, and that men are the most interesting prey. However, Rainsford argues that men are not meant to be killed. In the first sentence, he refers to this as "cold-blooded murder," while in the second sentence he argues that they are men, and therefore, should not be hunted. The fact that he condemns this action shows that he was also not justified in killing Zaroff.
