The solution for this problem is get first the total sales, credit sales and receivables turnover.
187,000 / 0.086 = $2,174,418 this is your total sales
2,174,418 x 60% = $1,304,651 is your credit sales
1,304,651 / 126,370 = 10.32 times is the Receivables turnover
365 / 10.32 = 35.37 days is the day's sales in receivables
Answer:
JANUARY = 218.28
FEBRUARY = 184.8
MARCH = 207.36
Explanation:
Trend component of demand equation :
Ft = 90 + 6t, where t = 0 in June of last year
Seasonal relatives are ;
1.07 for January
0.88 for February
0.96 for March
Forecast for January, February and March of next year:
JANUARY :
last year June, 't' = 0,
[last year - this year - next year]
Therefore January of next year, 't' = 19
Ft = 90 + 6(19) = 204
Forecast = Ft × seasonal relative
Forecast = 204 × 1.07 = 218.28
FEBRUARY :
Therefore January of next year, 't' = 20
Ft = 90 + 6(20) = 210
Forecast = Ft × seasonal relative
Forecast = 210 × 0.88 = 184.8
MARCH:
Therefore January of next year, 't' = 21
Ft = 90 + 6(21) = 216
Forecast = Ft × seasonal relative
Forecast = 216 × 0.96 = 207.36
Answer:
(a) $10 million
(b) $1 per share
(c) $49
(d) 25 %
Explanation:
(a) Estimated net earnings for next year.
Sales next year = $100 million
Net profit margin = 10%
Net profit margin = Net Income ÷ Sales
Net Income = 10% × $100 million
= $10 mil
lion
(b) Next year's dividends per share.
Dividend payout = Dividends paid ÷ Net Income
= 50%
Dividends paid = $10 × 50%
= $5 mil
lion
Per share dividend = Dividend paid ÷ Shares outstanding
= $5 million ÷ 5 million
= $1 per share
(c) The expected price of the stock (assuming the P/E ratio is 24.5 times earnings).
Earnings per share:
= Net income ÷ shares outstanding
= $10 million ÷ 5 million
= $2 per share
P/E Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share
Price per share = $2 × 24.5
= $49
(d) The expected holding period return (latest stock price: $40 per share).
= (Final price - Initial price + Dividend) ÷Initial Price
= ($49 - $40 + $1) ÷ $40
= 25%
Answer:
$30,000
$6,000
Explanation:
Carlos risk = $30,000
Carlos risk of $30,000 is the amount of funds which he had invested in the course of his business which is why Carlos is not considered at-risk for the nonrecourse loan reason been that carlos is not found liable because the loan was not used in the business which makes him to have a risk of $30,000.
$24,000 loss that occured will reduces Carlos’ amount at-risk to $6,000
($30,000 - $24,000)
=$6,000