Answer:
I do not agree.
Explanation:
The arrival of the British in sub-Saharan Africa is part of European Colonialism, widespread in various parts of the world, with the aim of exploring and dominating a region and all the resources available in it.
It is common to hear that colonization was a blessing for the life of the colonies because it took culture, religion and modenity to a region considered "wild" and "inadequate". However, we can say that colonization was not a blessing anywhere, since in these regions the adoption of European culture and religion was imposed in very violent and authoritarian ways.
All colonies, including sub-Saharan Africa, already had a population established and organized according to their customs and religion. This population was different from what Europeans considered "civilized", but we cannot deny, that the natives had their own type of civilization that functioned efficiently between their citizens and their territory.
However, Europeans considered themselves the owners of the truth, and the only ones endowed with knowledge and education. They totally ignored native civilizations and their cultures, considering them wild and impure, which needed European society to put them in what was right. They used this concept to justify all the violent exploitation and acculturation that the natives went through, because they believed that God had given them the mission to "fix" the peoples and end the civilization that was established in the place, without any consideration.
It was against Native American rights.
Answer:
It originated in the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
From the code; HR612, HR means house of representatives.
Hope this helps!!!
Please mark as brainliest.
Answer: My response
Explanation:
Pros:
Troops are effictive in minimizing the threat of angry protesters, pemobs etc, through tactics such as blocking/holding back crowds, etc
They are often used in the events of a crisis, such as a war or natural disaster to aid with medical care, food distrubution, and other services
Cons:
Especially in oppressive regimes, troops might abuse their rights and use their influence to coerce innocent people to give them money, etc. They might also cause outrage by taking actions such as beating up, teargassing, killing, or mass arresting protesters
Troops may use their power to attempt coups, throwing off the stability of a countries govt.
Sorry for the spelling errors,
Jade
