Answer:
Here, I have presented the completion of your question along with options and answers.
Which best describes the role of the US Supreme Court in the 2000 presidential election?
It declared George W. Bush the winner of the election.
It refused to become involved in the election.
It ordered a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.
It stopped a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.
The correct answer for your question is option (D) – It stopped a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.
Polk believed that it was the destiny of the U.S. to expand
entire continent as part of its Manifest Destiny. He believed that the war with
Mexico fitted well with that vision.
When the U.S. won it took over several territories from the Mexicans.
knights or if in France musketeers sorry its seven days late STAY SAFE and have a good day =D
The National Assembly of France.
This was illegal according to the laws of the time, but the 3rd Estate was declaring those laws and rules as a system that opposed the will and well-being of the people of France.
The old laws on the books said that when a gathering of the Estates General occurred, each of the three estates met separately and each group had one collective vote (the consensus of the whole group) as their final vote. The 1st Estate (clergy) and 2nd Estate (nobility), representing 2% of the population total, would combine their votes in opposition to the vote of the 3rd Estate (the common people). The 3rd Estate essentially declared that they, 98% of the nation, were the nation and that their delegates thus were the National Assembly.
There's more to the story than that, but we'll keep it brief here for now!
It is due to the climate, and everyone on the southern border, since a lot of Canada is inhospitable, and above all, Americans have the American Dream going for them, eh?