1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elanso [62]
3 years ago
12

Which claims about the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Declaration of the Independence are true?

History
2 answers:
Mice21 [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A And C

Explanation:

Took the Quiz

Fudgin [204]3 years ago
3 0

The correct statements are:  

  • A. The Declaration of Independence speaks of a Divine Creator and The Declaration of the Rights of Man speaks of a Supreme Being.
  • C. Both documents drew on the natural law philosophy of John Locke.

Some additional details about the "Divine Creator" and "Supreme Being" distinction:

The Declaration of Independence (1776) famously asserted, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."  America's founding fathers tended to speak in religious terms associated with the Christian tradition, even though a number of them were more like Deists in their own beliefs.  Deists believe that there is a God who created the world, but set it up to run by natural laws and did not intervene in a personal way in its operation.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (1789) was less overt in ascribing the rights of human beings to God as Creator.  That declaration of the French Revolution stated, "The National Assembly recognizes and proclaims, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following rights of man and of the citizen."  They were using more overtly Deist language, acknowledging a Supreme Being that was the reasonable force governing all things, but seeing human beings in society granting rights according to the actions of a just government.

You might be interested in
What is the causes???
vodomira [7]

Answer:

add me on insta

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
2. Locate three words or phrases used by the cartoonist to identify objects or people within the cartoon.
yawa3891 [41]
I see millions, iron workers and lumber workers
3 0
3 years ago
I need help I really don’t know
Maurinko [17]

Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.

In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.

In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.

7 0
3 years ago
What is Muhammed's role in Isam?
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

Prophet ,statesman ,author ,and reformer.

Explanation:

He has earned for himself as a consequence the respect and reverance of countless people , muslim and non-muslim everywhere.

5 0
3 years ago
What did the Truman Doctrine say?
andrezito [222]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Got it right on edge 2022

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the benefits of a nomadic life
    5·1 answer
  • People living in _______ are more likely to be vandalized?
    10·1 answer
  • At national party conventions, delegates make platforms. A platform is A. a plan of how to win elections. B. an announcement of
    11·2 answers
  • The Nazis most likely used the death marches to
    10·2 answers
  • Which group had conflicts with silver miners over land and water rights?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the name given to journalists who focused on the poverty and corruption in the cities?
    15·2 answers
  • What difficulties did the patriots face at valley forge?
    15·2 answers
  • How did advancements made by Gupta scholars spread from India across Asia? A.through an expansive trade network B.through the Ar
    10·2 answers
  • Help me please it’s due today
    14·1 answer
  • In a racially divided America, what did the Tuskegee airmen<br> prove?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!