Answer:
a) it could be produced easily and quickly.
Explanation:
In the colonial times of the 17th century, tobacco was "a poor man´s crop" and sugar was " a rich man´s crop," and these were the two main crops in the English settlements in the West Indies. Tobacco was easy to plant, to cultivate and its processing was not complicated. It didn´t require a large labor force per acre.
Answer: B: to end the practice of slavery
Explanation:
Answer:Emperador romano es el término utilizado por los historiadores para referirse a los gobernantes del Imperio romano tras el final de la República romana.
En la Antigua Roma no existía el título de «emperador romano», sino que este título era más bien una abreviatura práctica para una complicada reunión de cargos y poderes. A pesar de la popularidad actual del título, el primero en ostentarlo realmente fue Miguel I Rangabé a principios del siglo IX, cuando se hizo llamar Basileus Rhomaion (‘emperador de los romanos’). Hay que tener en cuenta que en aquella época el significado de Basileus había cambiado de ‘soberano’ a ‘emperador’. Tampoco existía ningún título o rango análogo al título de emperador, sino que todos los títulos asociados tradicionalmente al emperador tenían su origen en la época republicana.
La discusión sobre los emperadores romanos está influenciada en gran medida por el punto de vista editorial de los historiadores. Los mismos romanos no compartían los modernos conceptos monárquicos de «imperio» y «emperador». Durante su existencia, el Imperio romano conservó todas las instituciones políticas y las tradiciones de la República romana, incluyendo el Senado y las asambleas.
En general, no se puede describir a los emperadores como gobernantes de iure. Oficialmente, el cargo de emperador era considerado como el «primero entre iguales» (primus inter pares), y muchos de ellos no llegaron a ser gobernantes de facto, sino que frecuentemente fueron simples testaferros de poderosos burócratas, funcionarios, mujeres y generales.
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) to mobilize resources quickly.
A government might intervene in a market economy during times of war to mobilize resources quickly.
although a country operates under a Capitalist economy, during times of war the system can be adjusted.
In the free-enterprise system, the federal government has minimum regulation of the economy. The free market is the main component of Capitalism where owners can be as rich as they can, and employees can benefit from bonuses and other incentives.
However, during a war, the government needs to mobilize resources quickly to send weaponry and supplies to the war front. That is why it can intervene in the economy. Indeed this was what happened in the United States during World War I and World War II.
Answer: redraw voting districts that are roughly equal in population
Explanation:
In Baker v. Carr (1962), held that Tennessee had infringed the constitutional right of equal protection and forced its legislature to reapportion itself based on population. Before that, rural areas had been overrepresented when compared to urban and suburban areas, especially in the South. Although this case didn´t change electoral districts immediatly, it did set a precedent about federal courts addressing redistricting, and by 1964, in Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims, the United States House of Representatives and the state legislatures were required to establish electoral districts of equal population based on the idea of one man, one vote.
.
