2. How should employers respond to K to 12 graduates who apply for vacant positions in
3. What were the perceived disadvantages of K to 12 graduates pcompared to college students?
4. What factors could give K to 12 graduates an advantage in the labor market?
Discussion Questions
1.
What is the dilemma K to 12 graduates face when applying for a job?
their company? Pa help asap po
Answer:
1. Coke vs Pepsi: product include Cold Beverage
2. Nike vs Reebok: product include sporting goods
Answer:
no fiduciary relationship has been established
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario no fiduciary relationship has been established. A fiduciary is a person who holds a legal or ethical relationship that revolves around trust with another person or group. This type of person usually handles money for other people. In this scenario though, since the individual is just taking over temporarily for the couple and is not handling the couples house purchase, then no relationship has been established.
The answer to this question is Imprint.
<span>Imprinting is an approach that makes the consumers /
customers remember your brand. Imprint simply means leaving something in your
mind which last long and gives an impact. Imprinting is very important in
businesses because when you imprint your brand in the mind of the customers it
gives a long information about the product and gives a lasting impression. </span><span> </span>
Answer:
The given situation comes under professional ethics.
Explanation:
Professional ethics are values that regulate the behavior of a person or a business group. They are like rules telling how a person should act in given situations.
Many times, only the legally correct statements are not enough. When the company's chief executive officer has a discussion with Yellowstone County representatives, he should disclose both the reports. By doing so, he would follow professional ethics of not suppressing reports about the toxic by-products. He could also show any flaws in the report of the fired researcher.
