Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
Just write what you felt while reviewing the lesson, its very simple. Maybe put some research into this person
Police brutality is the use of excessive and unnecessary force on the part of a police officer when he is interacting with a civilian, resulting in a violation of the civilian’s civil rights.
<em>Examples of police brutality that are not physical in nature include false arrests, verbal abuse, and racial profiling.</em>
<em />
“Excessive force” is defined as force that is beyond that which would be appropriate for the situation.
<em>Sorry i dont know an example.</em>
