I think it determines your progress at something. It determines on what you can, or need to improve, or possibly change.
Explanation:
The gains achieved by the White minority in the first four decades of the 20th century were, by the 1940s, increasingly under threat however, as African resistance to the racially based system rapidly escalated. This crisis was brought to a head by the continuing decline of the reserve economies. Full proletarianisation in South Africa, would threaten the migrant labour system upon which White profitability depended. This crisis coincided with rapid secondary industrialisation and a substantial growth of urban African populations, as well as growing trade union activity and rising African working class militancy. These developments were threatening not only the conditions for accumulation but White political hegemony itself.
Explanation:
The French Revolution was a revolution in France from 1789 to 1799. The result of the French Revolution was the end of the monarchy. King Louis XVI was executed in 1793. The revolution ended when Napoleon Bonaparte took power in November 1799.
The Roman Constitution called for the government to be made up of the senate, the legislative assemblies, and the executive magistrates. This is an example of the separation of powers.
The methods that historians utilize to write history differs based on their perspective and interest. But, many begin with some similar research methods. Basically, they're factors like philosophy and focus that make writing history unique to the historians.
