The italicized word is a Predicate Nominative. See the definition of same below.
<h3>What is predicate Nominative?</h3>
A predicate nominative (or predicate noun) is a word or group of words that completes and renames a linking verb.
Another way to put it is:
A predicate nominative is (also known as a predicate noun) is a term or collection of words that renames the subject and completes a connecting verb.
See a parallel example:
"It was a monster."
- "It" renames "A monster"
- It = Subject
- Was = Linking verb
- a monster = predicate nominative..
Hence,
- John Clement = Subject
- has been = linking verb
- my friend = predicate nominative
- for three years.= Adverbial phrase of time
Learn more about Predicate Nominative at;
brainly.com/question/731911
#SPJ1
I hate it! I hate having to do it when I should be having fun! School always encourages going outside and hanging out with family and then makes you do school OUT OF SCHOOL for like 4 hours
Answer:
Examples:
They are televising his interview throughout the world.
The TV station is televising his interview throughout the world.
Explanation:
There are various 'unknown' possibilities for the subject; THAT'S why this sentence is usually written in the passive: when you don't know who is performing the action. (AND/OR, of course, when you want the focus to be on the receiver of the action, in this case: the interview.)
Answer:
The best option is letter A. Identifying with the opposing side.
Explanation:
Effective arguments are the ones carried out ethically, responsibly, and politely. They not only defend or attack an issue or opinion, but do so in a respectable way. One of the biggest mistakes someone taking part in an argument can make is dismissing the opposite side's point of view from the start. That creates tension and unnecessary aggressiveness. Sensible arguments take the other side into consideration and even acknowledge the points which the other side is correct about. A famous method of carrying out respectful arguments is the Socratic method. This method avoids blunt and aggressive accusations or rebuttals. Instead, it asks enticing questions to provoke the other side into thinking and reassessing their position.