Answer:
The test is not significant at 5% level of significance, hence we conclude that there's no variation among the discussion sections.
Step-by-step explanation:
Assumptions:
1. The sampling from the different discussion sections was independent and random.
2. The populations are normal with means and constant variance
There's no variation among the discussion sections
There's variation among the discussion sections
Df Sum Sq Mean sq F value Pr(>F)
Section 7 525.01 75 1.87 0.99986
Residuals 189 7584.11 40.13
Test Statistic = 
Since our p-value is greater than our level of significance (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there's no significant variation among the eight discussion sections.
I’m sorry this isn’t an answer but what in the world are y’all learning what is this ?! i’m in high school & i don’t know this
Parallelogram area = base * height
240 = base * 20
base = 240 / 20
base = 12 cm
The larger the number of simulations the more likely are the results to be closest to those predicted by the probability theory.
When large number of simulations are run, some results might be higher than the results of probability theory, some results might be lower than the results of the probability theory and some might be exactly the same. So the average of all these results will be close to the results of Probability Theory. Thus, more the number of simulations, greater is the chance that the results are closer to those of simulation theory.
Thus, option A will be the correct answer.
Is is b I am sure that is the right
