I think the answer is a I hope this helps:)
Answer:
Loyalist was the people who choose to stay loyal with the British government during the American Revolution. Patriots are the revolutionaries who wanted to give independence for United States.
Throughout the years, many of the Loyalists were given with 'rewards' by the British Kings for their service to the Crown. They argued that all American colonists will receive the same favor if they show their loyalty to the King.
The Patriots argued that The British empire have no intention to treat all American colonists fairly. They only select a few of loyalists as a puppet to give false hope to the people. The patriots pointed out the Unfair Tax legislations that imposed by the British which cut down a lot of Colonists' income.
Answer:
Cuneiform was used as a form of record-keeping and it was picked up by the speakers of different languages. This helped to perpetuate it across different cultures. Today it is largely preserved on stone tablets whereas other exemplars of early languages were kept on more perishable materials like leather or papyrus.
Explanation:
Cuneiform was a language that many societies in the Ancient Near East had in common. The cuneiform style was so dominant that scholars have said that it is the script for the first half of recorded history. Even to this day, cuneiform tablets survive in great abundance. The cuneiform script was not in itself a language. Scribes from different cultures could decipher and use it to convey information in a number of languages and not just ancient Sumerian. Among them is the Semitic language Akkadian which was the lingua franca of the Assyrian Empire and for the Babylonians. The Rosetta Stone equivalent for cuneiform is Bisitun Pass in Iran. There there are inscriptions recorded in Persian, Akkadian, and an Iranian language known as Elamite. This allowed researchers to decipher repetitive words across the different languages like “Darius” and “king” and so they could eventually piece together the information that cuneiform conveyed.
In assessing the internal validity of an intervention, we try to determine if certain changes cause certain outcomes. It is relevant in studies that try to establish casual relationship. While in observational or descriptive studies, it is not that relevant. It is also possible to have internal validity in a study and not have construct validity. Example, imagine a study where you are looking at the effects of a new computerized tutoring program on math performance in first grade students.
The correct answer is A.)
