Answer:
The North had an industrial economy, an economy focused on manufacturing, while the South had an agricultural economy, an economy focused on farming
Answer: Theodore Roosevelt's Foreign Policy.
Explanation:
In that position, young President Theodor Roosevelt considered it an ideal time for the United States to establish itself as the world's largest power. After the American-Spanish war, Zrmlja proved that it was dominant in the military sense, and based on that experience, it continued to build that policy. Roosevelt believed that the United States could be a major factor in the Western Hemisphere. Roosevelt began a project to build the Panama Canal in the early 20th century. That was part of the policy of the "Big Stick". In that way, the united states would realize the intention of the world military leader.
The canal's construction had a financial basis in the context of trade and geostrategic significance. The "Big Stick" policy was also reflected when sending the navy to Colombia; Roosevelt tried to settle the new situation in Panama. In this way, Roosevelt helped Panama enter the world union of countries, but at a certain price. Panama was an American protectorate until the beginning of World War II (1939). Thus Roosevelt ensured the smooth construction of the Panama Canal.
Answer:
Basham, Ashoka's personal religion became Buddhism, if not before, then certainly after the Kalinga War. However, according to Basham, the Dharma officially propagated by Ashoka was not Buddhism at all. ... After the Kalinga War and Ashoka's conversion, the Empire experienced nearly half a century of peace and security.
Explanation:
Let's begin by defining what a leader is. A leader is someone who supports his/her subordinates in all possible way so followers can be engaged to the goals. Now, there are positive and dangerous leaders. These are three ways both kinds of leaders use their leadership to achieve different goals:
1) They use their authority to impose their point of view regardless of what others think. This is dangerous.
2) They know their influence to get know their team in all aspects. He is very well aware of their team's weaknesses and strengths. Therefore, he will make educated decisions on assigning tasks to achieve their goals. This is positive.
3) They are willing and determined to destroy others who may be on their way just to get what they want. When I say destroy, I mean they might undermine someone's integrity to get rid of him/her.
Now, dangerous leaders do have their own goals. Most of the time, such goals are connected to their own interests. Thus, this dangerous leader will try to do anything to achieve them. For examples, they might badmouth others, make up toxic stories about colleagues. They could even damage the team whole image and blame on them just to get what they want.
Answer:
It is C, Political Party.
Explanation: