Hacktivists and state actors have differences and the differences are described below.
<h3 /><h3>What is Government?</h3>
Government is the ruling party of a state, it is chosen by the individuals/ citizens of the society, there is a voting process which entitles every individual with one vote which they cast for their favorite candidate and the one with majority wins and forms a government.
Hacktivists are the individuals who hacks computer for political reasons, these individuals hack the information of government and government websites.
State actors are the individuals working for the government, these individuals are representing the government and therefore are known as the State Actors.
The major difference is that the Hacktivists are not employed by the government however the State actors are government employees.
Learn more about Government at brainly.com/question/27282615
#SPJ1
Kabuto vs naruto?
naruto won with rasengan
kabuto won with medical ninjutsu
In problem solving, a method that always produces a problem solution (though not necessarily very efficiently) is known as algorithm. The algorithm is a defined procedure (set of step-by-step procedures ) that provides the correct answer to a particular problem and <span>yields the best possible answer every time. </span>This method is often expressed in the form of a graph.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The punishment being handed out will help you in the future by making it so you never cheat again.
