Answer:
The answer is compensating wage differentials.
Explanation:
The term refers to an extra amount of money that should be offered to a worker in order to perform a difficult, dangerous or undisirable job. On the other hand, it's also possible to offer a <u>negative</u> differential for jobs that may be desirable or easy to perform (they get paid less).
Some factors to consider are risk of injury or risk of future unemployment.
Where's the problem? I can not see the problem
Answer:
B. increase tuition in order to increase revenue
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand is a concept that seeks to measure the sensitivity of demand to the price of a good or service. Thus, if demand is elastic, it means that even small variations in price have a strong impact on demand. Conversely, if demand is inelastic, variations in the price of the good will not greatly affect demand, meaning consumers will continue to demand that particular good or service. The calculation of the price elasticity of demand consists in the division between the variation of the quantity demanded by the variation in the price practiced. If the result is greater than 1, demand is considered elastic (price sensitive). Conversely, if elasticity is less than 1, demand is considered inelastic (little price sensitive). If elasticity equals one, then the change in demand is exactly the same as the price change.
In the case of this faculty, the demand for courses is 0,91, so it's less than 1, therefore inelastic demand. This way, the college can maximize its revenue by increasing the tuition fee.
Answer:
network issue, light going issue, boring class
Answer:
Though the Louisiana territory had changed hands between France and Spain a number of times, in 1800 Spain ceded the territory to Napoleon’s France. Napoleon, whose attention was consumed by war in Europe, began to view the territory as a needless burden. In 1803, he volunteered to sell all 828,000 square miles to the United States for the bargain price of $15 million.
Jefferson adhered to a strict interpretation of the Constitution and believed that without a specific enumeration of his right as president to acquire the purchase, buying the Louisiana Territory could plausibly be unconstitutional. The Federalists opposed the purchase for several reasons, chief among them the likelihood that new slave states would enter the Union from the southern parts of the territory.
Explanation: