Answer:
sorry just getting points
Explanation:
Answer:
The term “religious language” refers to statements or claims made about God or gods. Here is a typical philosophical problem of religious language.
I believe the answer is <span>material culture
</span><span>material culture refers to the touchable objects that people use to definte their cultures.
For examples, material cultures for japanese cultures would be Kimono, japanese temples, japanese foods, Katana, etc.</span>
Upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office is not an explanation for the given statement.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given statement the discussion involves life expectancy with respect to education, occupation and income and explain its meaning that upper class live longer and healthier lives than those in lower class.
But the statement that upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office do not categorize statement according to lower or upper class, that safer environment for work can be available among educated, occupated and handsome income constituted society only, because many brutal cases are examples of unsafe working atmosphere too and even in well structured office.
Education, Occupation and Income are sources of happiness but decision to stay happy and sensible for either rich or poor basically generate from within’s intellectual learning and not biased with any race.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
