Answer: When people have insurance against a certain event, the notion that those people are less likely to guard against that event occurring is called a <u>moral hazard.</u>
Explanation: Moral hazard happens frequently in cases of insurance. If a person has a house, they can decide to install a vault because it reduces the risk of being robbed;
However, when the same person has arranged an insurance that covers the risk of theft of the house, they will have fewer incentives than in the previous situation, to install the security door and ultimately it will be able to increase the probability of the loss in this Theft case. This behavior, for example, before insurance coverage is called moral hazard.
Answer:
Dual
Explanation:
real estate transaction,which is used to convey ownership of a particular property to the buyer whereby there is a mutual agreement on some terms. The contract may be long it in shirt time.the end process is usually reffered to as “closing,” and this is a term that explains that both parties need to fulfill all terms and conditions that is associated with the exchange.
It should be noted that When a single broker represents both parties in a real estate transaction, a dual agency may exist.
Answer: 7.46%
Explanation:
The CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL is a very useful tool for calculating a firm's Cost of Equity.
The Formula is,
Rc = Rrf + b(Rpm)
Where,
Rc is the Cost of Equity
Rpf is the Risk risk free rate
b is beta
Rpm is the risk premium
Plugging in the digits we have,
Rc = 0.0350 + 0.88(0.045)
= 0.0746
The firm's cost of equity from retained earnings based on the CAPM is therefore 7.46%
You could provide large print or braille materials for her.
Answer:
Firm A will spend $4,000.
Explanation:
The chemical dumped into the river daily by
Firm A = 50 ton
Firm B = 50 ton
ATQ,
The clean-up cost of Firm B before getting into the river = $50 per ton.
= $50 x 50tons = $2500.
2). Pollution rate as per government = $75 per ton
No. of permits = 40
= $75 x 40
= $3000
As we know,
The clean-up cost of Firm B is lesser than the cost of pollution permits with $500($3000 - $2500). Cleaning up the pollution would be best because it is a cheaper alternative..
The cleanup cost of Firm A per ton = $100 per ton.
= $100 x 50tons
= $5000
2). Pollution rate as per the govt. = $75 per ton
= $75 x 40 permits
= $3000.
The clean-up cost of Firm A is greater than the cost of pollution permits with $2000. Thus, the cleaning up the pollution would cost more for Firm A. Thus, they must go for purchasing the permits.
3). Purchasing 40 pollution permits would cost
= $100 x 40
= $4000.
