<span>Canada and Greenland</span>
Answer:Both Is the evidence sufficient to support the speaker's claims? and Is the evidence relevant to the speaker's claims?
Explanation:
Before one can make a claim there should be enough evidence to support that claim otherwise it could sound just like their own opinion or views on the matter that they are discussing .
Sufficient claim can or will give viewers or listeners the factual information about what one is claiming which may make persuasion more effective .
People are more likely to believe something and be convinced about it as long as there is sufficient evidence to support it and they can see how the evidence is linked or related to the claim .
Otherwise if the evidence doesn't relate to the claim then it can not be taken as an evidence for that particular claim and people can easily dismiss that claim.
For Americans to be more united we must create courts, create and enforce laws, have a military, have public education, and protect our God-given rights for ourselves and future generations, by the authority we have created the Constitution for the United States
The distribution shows that 91% which is pretty much the very high-end were earning below $1,200 a year which means they were turning that much and we can infer that in the 18th there were people with a very poor background and technology want advance at that time and outcome of that would be people would be very poor and in this
It also showed that there were only 9% of people who are earning above $1,200 and this shows that not many people would have earned that but due to the background the amount of job opportunity the wages the seller which which all contribute and in this scenario
There are four option but the correct answer would be A as it also shows that not many people that much then having a poor background is a very good explanation to put this through. you you also tells that only a minority and above $1,200
So the correct answer is A
