In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
Answer:
balancing a checkbook.
Explanation:
An individual in this stage may have difficulty doing tasks such as balancing a checkbook. This sort of task requires a higher level of cognitive activity that may be very difficult for an individual in the early stages of dementia. This is because the early stages of this disease have very noticeable issues with memory, speed of thought, language or behaviour, which are all needed for these sort of tasks.
B - peaked in the mid-1990s
According to the chart, it shows the highest levels of deforestation in 1994 (which is when it peaked). The graph is not getting smaller, so it's not on the decline nor could the graph show that it was banned by the UN.
Answer:
The Texas constitution grants the governor veto power and it is used actively
Explanation:
