Answer: its call Beringia and it was a large expanse of ice that allowed the nomads to cross the ocean by walking.
Explanation:
Answer:
Events happening at the same time might have influenced one another
Explanation:
Citing or analyzing the historical context in isolation without considering other historical events happening during that time, might affect the true analysis or reason for the actual occurrence of such event under consideration.
Hence, in this case, it is always recommended or important to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation because "events happening at the same time might have influenced one another"
I would disagree with the statement "United States vs. Nixon expanded the power of the presidency." In reality, it shrank the power of the president.
In this Supreme Court case, Richard Nixon refused to give up taped conversations he had from the Oval Office. Nixon claimed that this action was protected by the idea of "executive privilege." This meant that because he was president, he had the ability to keep these tapes from going to the courts. However the Supreme Court, in a unanimous vote, stated that the president must give up the tapes. This showed that no person was above the law, including the president. This shows that the presidents are responsible to the courts and do not have special protection in legal cases.
Answer:
People were worried about their earning, apart from feeling of nationalism
Explanation:
Answer:
Decisions were made by the Allies about how to shape postwar Europe.
Explanation:
