A. <span>Because the English were able to convert 100,000 people to the Catholic faith after Elizabeth took the throne. </span>
Answer:
no. A. lt helped them bring water to their crops
Answer:
21. ancient geographical region human sacrifices were viewed as a compensation for the sacrifices the gods had themselves created in making the globe. In Mesoamerican culture human sacrifices were viewed as a compensation for the sacrifices the gods had themselves created in making the globe and therefore the sun.
22. Lacking food and ravaged by pox sickness earlier introduced by one amongst the Spaniards, the Aztecs, currently junction rectifier by Cuauhtemoc, finally folded when ninety three days of resistance on the fateful day of thirteenth of August, 1521 CE. Tenochtitlan was raped and its monuments destroyed
23. Born around 1485, Cortez was a Spanish adventurer and human WHO defeated the Aztecs and claimed North American nation for Kingdom of Spain. He 1st set sail to the New World at the age of nineteen. Hernan Cortes later joined associate expedition to Cuba
24. The Incas created a road and road system in Republic of Peru with over eighteen,000 miles of roads.
The Incas had a sort of communicating system wherever relay messengers ran across rope bridges to deliver communications to subsequent team. ...
The Incas performed winning bone surgeries.
The Incas were the primary to cultivate the potato in Republic of Peru.
25. Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui was the ninth Sapa Inca of the dominion of town that he reworked into the Inca Empire. Most archaeologists currently believe that the known Inca website of Machu Picchu was designed as associate degree estate for Pachacuti.
<span>Crimes are considered offenses against the state, or society as a whole. That means that even though one person might murder another person, murder itself is considered an offense to everyone in society. Accordingly, crimes against the state are prosecuted by the state, and the prosecutor (not the victim) files the case in court as a representative of the state. If it were a civil case, then the wronged party would file the case.Criminal offenses and civil offenses are generally different in terms of their punishment. Criminal cases will have jail time as a potential punishment, whereas civil cases generally only result in monetary damages or orders to do or not do something. Note that a criminal case may involve both jail time and monetary punishments in the form of fines.The standard of proof is also very different in a criminal case versus a civil case. Crimes must generally be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt", whereas civil cases are proved by lower standards of proof such as "the preponderance of the evidence" (which essentially means that it was more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way). The difference in standards exists because civil liability is considered less blameworthy and because the punishments are less severe.Criminal cases almost always allow for a trial by jury. Civil cases do allow juries in some instances, but many civil cases will be decided by a judge.A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to an attorney, and if he or she can't afford one, the state must provide an attorney. A defendant in a civil case is not given an attorney and must pay for one, or else defend him or herself.The protections afforded to defendants under criminal law are considerable (such as the protection against illegal searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment). Many of these well known protections are not available to a defendant in a civil case.</span>
In general, because criminal cases have greater consequences - the possibility of jail and even death - criminal cases have many more protections in place and are harder to prove.
The Same Conduct Can Produce Civil and Criminal Liability
Although criminal and civil cases are treated very differently, many people often fail to recognize that the same conduct can result in both criminal and civil liability. Perhaps one of the most famous examples of this is the OJ Simpson trial. The same conduct led to a murder trial (criminal) and a wrongful death trial (civil). In part because of the different standards of proof, there was not enough evidence for a jury to decide that OJ Simpson was guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" in the criminal murder case. In the civil trial, however, the jury found enough evidence to conclude that OJ Simpson wrongfully caused his wife's death by a "preponderance of the evidence".
