1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anastassius [24]
3 years ago
10

Each of the following statements is about voting trends in recent US elections. Which of the statements is FALSE? A. Male citize

ns are more likely to vote than female citizens. B. White citizens are more likely to vote than citizens of other races. C. Older citizens are more likely to vote than younger citizens. D. Wealthy citizens are more likely to vote than poor citizens Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Social Studies
2 answers:
snow_lady [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. Male citizens are more likely to vote than female citizens.

Explanation:

Women are usually as participative as men in the country's elections. This has not changed recently and more and more women are committing to participate in the election process. This is because policies are increasingly inclusive with women and have presented points that interfere with the lives of women across the country. For this reason, to have their interests defended, the number of female votes has been proportional to the number of male votes.

Amanda [17]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer would be A. Male citizens are more likely to vote than female citizens. I hope this helps you out!

You might be interested in
Name and explain two laws that protect citizens against human rights violation​
Artemon [7]

Answer:

Article 2 protects your right to life

Article 2 of the Human Rights Act protects your right to life.

This means that nobody, including the Government, can try to end your life. It also means the Government should take appropriate measures to safeguard life by making laws to protect you and, in some circumstances, by taking steps to protect you if your life is at risk.

Public authorities should also consider your right to life when making decisions that might put you in danger or that affect your life expectancy.

If a member of your family dies in circumstances that involve the state, you may have the right to an investigation. The state is also required to investigate suspicious deaths and deaths in custody.

The courts have decided that the right to life does not include a right to die.

Separately, Protocol 13, Article 1 of the Human Rights Act makes the death penalty illegal in the UK.

Are there any restrictions to this right?

Article 2 is often referred to as an ‘absolute right’. These are rights that can never be interfered with by the state. There are situations, however, when it does not apply.

For example, a person’s right to life is not breached if they die when a public authority (such as the police) uses necessary force to:

stop them carrying out unlawful violence

make a lawful arrest

stop them escaping lawful detainment, and

stop a riot or uprising.

Of course, even in these circumstances, the force used must be essential and strictly proportionate. Force is ‘proportionate’ when it is appropriate and no more than necessary to address the problem concerned.

The positive obligation on the state to protect a person’s life is not absolute. Due to limited resources, the state might not always be able fulfil this obligation. This could mean, for example, that the state does not have to provide life-saving drugs to everyone in all circumstances.

Using this right – example

A social worker from the domestic violence team in a local authority used human rights arguments to get new accommodation for a woman and her family at risk of serious harm from a violent ex-partner. She based her case on the local authority’s obligation to protect the family’s right to life and the right not to be treated in an inhuman or degrading way.

(Example provided by the British Institute of Human Rights)

What the law says

This text is taken directly from the Human Rights Act.

Article 2: Right to life

1. Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which the penalty is provided by law.

2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:

in defence of any person from unlawful violence

in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained, and

in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.

Note: See Article 1 of Protocol 13 for the wording in the Act that makes the death penalty illegal in the UK.

Example case: Pretty v United Kingdom [2002]

A woman suffering from an incurable degenerative disease wanted to control when and how she died. To avoid an undignified death, she wanted her husband to help her take her life. She sought assurance that he would not be prosecuted, but the European Court of Human Rights found that the right to life does not create a right to choose death rather than life. It meant there was no right to die at the hands of a third person or with the assistance of a public authority.

Case summary taken from Human rights, human lives: a guide to the Human Rights Act for public authorities, which shares examples and legal case studies that show how human rights work in practice.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT true of the House of Representatives?
MrMuchimi
B every member represents one congressional district
7 0
3 years ago
How do you think technology affected normas life?
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Experts have found that in addition to making our lives more convenient, but there's a negative side to technology — it can be addicting and it can hurt our communication skills. Extended screen time can result in health ramifications like insomnia, eyestrain, and increased anxiety and depression.

Explanation:

The development of technology has led to so many mind-blowing discoveries, better facilities, and better luxuries, but at the same has dramatically changed our daily lives. Various highly-developed gadgets, connected to the Internet, have changed the way we communicate, use humor, study, work, shop, play, and behave. Technology also has altered human physiology. It makes us think differently, feel differently, even dream differently. It affects our memory, attention spans and sleep cycles. This is attributed to a scientific phenomenon known as neuroplasticity, or the brain's ability to alter its behavior based on new experiences.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which factor makes capitalism such a successful economic system?
lilavasa [31]

Individual citizens have the freedom to take risks and improve their lives.

Explanation:

<u>Most essential reason for the success of capitalism as an economic system is the freedom an individual has to take risks</u> to further their own station in life. The risk taker may or may not become successful but this freedom allows for great social mobility.

<u>Improvement of lives through fiscal development is allowed for in capitalism the best</u> as it ascertains rights in the market to people who can use them correctly to gain advantages for themselves.

6 0
3 years ago
What does this map symbol represent on a map​
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

It represent Mountain symbol

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to the philosophy of John Locke:
    13·1 answer
  • This gives the federal government the right to tax your income
    15·2 answers
  • What documents do i need to get a passport
    15·2 answers
  • the process of perception occurs in three continuous stages that blend into one another true or false
    6·2 answers
  • What is the process of changing plants or animalimals to make them more useful to humans
    5·1 answer
  • After struggling with the accounting training, Aaron is unsure whether he can complete the end-of-year financial reporting with
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement correctly explains the
    8·1 answer
  • Hen Nancy moves 8-month-old Abigail's toy out of her crib, Abigail begins to look for it. Abigail has developed: Multiple choice
    14·1 answer
  • Our textbook suggests that studying death, dying, and bereavement can help us learn about: a. None of the above b. Vulnerability
    9·1 answer
  • A team of teachers from a math department works together to create an intervention in the classroom. One teacher is selected as
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!