The answer is "<span>Improving the quality of parental supervision".
Parental observing alludes to parental supervision of adolescent exercises in different spaces (i.e., companions, school and conduct at home), and correspondence to the immature that the parent is worried about, and mindful of, those exercises. Poor parental observing and supervision of youngster and youthful exercises has been shown to anticipate pre-adult liquor use in various longitudinal investigations.</span>
32 degrees F
Freezing point of Celcius is 0, which, converted to Fahrenheit, would be 32.
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
Hello
Indigo could be used as dye for people who had no other way to dye their clothes or anything that they want to look pretty.
Answer:
Nang papalabas ang matanda, dumating sa isang karwahe si Crisostomo Ibarra, kasama ng isang matandang katulong. Tumungo sila sa sementeryo, kung saan hahanapin ni Crisostomo ang libingan ng kanyang ama, si Don Rafael. Mayroong itinirik na krus at mga bulaklak ang katulong sa libingan ni Don Rafael, at tinanong nila ang sepulturero kung saan ito. Sinabi ng sepulturero na sinunog niya ang krus sa libingan ayon sa utos ng isang kura, subalit hiniling siyang sabihin kung saan ang libingan. Ang sagot ng sepulturero ay wala na ang patay sa libingan; mga ilang buwan sa nakaraan, hinukay niya ang bangkay ni Don Rafael. Dapat ililipat ito sa libingan ng mga Tsino, ngunit dahil malayo ito, at umuulan din noong araw na iyon, inihagis ng sepulturero ang bangkay sa ilog.
Sobrang nagalit si Crisostomo sa mga nalaman niya. Tinawag niyang kulang-palad na alipin ang sepulturero, at umalis ng sementeryo. Lumakad siya papunta sa isang lumang bahay, ang dating bahay niya, habang sumusunod lamang ang katulong. Natagpuan ni Crisostomo ang kura ng San Diego, si Padre Salvi. Sinunggaban ang kura ng binata, na sa magalit na tono ay nagtanong kung ano ang ginawa ng kura sa ama. Nanginginig at natatakot, sinabi ni Padre Salvi na wala siyang ginawa sa ama ni Ibarra, at agad-agad niyang tinuro si Padre Damaso bilang ang taong may kasalanan. Binitawan ang Pransiskano ni Crisostomo, na tumuloy sa loob ng kanyang bahay. Samantala, tinulong si Padre Salvi sa pagtayo ng katulong na kasama ni Crisostomo.
– Anong nalaman at ikinilos ni Crisostomo ang maituturing na masamang pangitain?
Nalaman ni Crisostomo na sinunog ng sepulturero ang krus na itinirik ng katulong ni Kapitan Tiago sa libingan ni Don Rafael Ibarra, at hinukay ang bangkay niya at inihagis ito sa ilog. Sa galit niya, muntik nang baliin ni Crisostomo ang braso ng sepulturero. Ang mas malala pa ay nalaman ni Crisostomo na ang nag-utos sa sepulturero na hukayin ang bangkay ay isang kura: si Padre Damaso.
Mga Palagay:
Ang masasabi ko lang sa kabanatang ito ay dito magiging mas malubha ang tunggalian sa pagitan nina Crisostomo Ibarra at Padre Damaso. Ito lang talaga ang palagay ko sa Kabanata 13.
Explanation:
buod mo nalang bb
