One good way is to do an online survey so you get the results intantly. the downside of online is that not every one knows that there is a survey. Hard copy surveys are also good, but the tend to get lost and cluttered. oh yeah, the more people take the survey, the more accurate it should be
Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
The answer is B. Investment banker.
Explanation:
Answer:
it depends on the business
Explanation:
when the business is small there will be less department but if the business is big then there will be more department
