1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
15

Roll over each item on the left to read the description. Identify whether each of the statements is an argument for or an argume

nt against a specific exchange rate regime, then place each item in the correct place on the chart.
2/5 points awarded Government adjusts Fluctuation with limits Scored Reduces uncertainty Argument for Argument Against Market-based Floating exchange rate Uncertainty Market-based Unknown elements Continual government intervention Fixed exchange rate No uncertainty Continual government intervention Managed-float Difficult Fluctuation with limits Difficult Pegged exchange rate Limited options Government adjusts Limited options Target Zone Reduces uncertainty Unknown elements No uncertainty

Business
1 answer:
Naya [18.7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<u>Floating exchange rate</u>

Here the market decides the value of the currency as it trade freely in the market based on supply and demand.

Argument For;

Market Based - It is market based therefore it reflects the true value of the currency.

Argument Against;

Uncertainty -  As it trades according to the whims of supply and demand, telling which direction it will go in terms of value is a difficult undertaking therefore financial decisions based on such are riskier.

<u>Fixed exchange rate</u>

Here the value of the currency is fixed either to the value of another currency or to the price of gold.

Argument For;

No Uncertainty -  As the currency is tied to another currency which is usually more stable or gold, the rate of the currency is more predictable.

Argument Against;

Unknown Elements

<u>Managed float</u>

In this exchange rate regime, the Central bank of a country intervenes in the Foreign exchange market to push or pull the currency in the direction that it prefers.

Argument For;

Government intervention - The Government Intervention ensures that the currency's value remains stable as well as allowing the Central bank to maintain a good balance of payments.

Argument Against;

Difficult - Maintaining the currency within the band preferred in a difficult undertaking that requires constant intervention in the Forex market.

<u>Pegged exchange rate</u>

The Central bank in this instance pegs the currency to a basket of currencies after setting an exchange rate it would prefer and then intervenes in forex market to keep it that way.

Argument For;

Reduces uncertainty - The movement of the currency is more predictable due to it being pegged to a basket of currencies.

Argument Against;

Continual government intervention - As this requires the currency to remain at a certain value, the government will keep intervening to ensure that it stays at that exact level.

<u>Target zone</u>

Here the Central Bank allows the currency to fluctuate on the market albeit with limits placed on how much it can do so.

Argument For;

Fluctuation with limits - By combining fixed regimes with floating regimes, the currency can maintain a semblance of true value whilst still be less uncertain.

Argument Against;

Limited options.

You might be interested in
The management of Bonga Corporation is considering dropping product D74F. Data from the company's accounting system for this pro
Mrac [35]

Answer:

mhm yeah

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Alex Ltd. produces kitchen tools, and operates several divisions as profit centers. Division M produces a product that it sells
alexira [117]

Answer:

Division N's purchase costs will decrease by $90,000 per year

Explanation:

Division N's purchase cost form outside vendor = total units purchased per year x unit price = 30,000 units x $15 = $450,000

if Division N obtains the product form division M with a transfer price of $12 per unit, their costs will decrease by = total units x (vendor price - transfer price) = 30,000 units x ($15 - $12) = $90,000 per year

4 0
3 years ago
Why aren't all people paid the same amount in factor payments for the resources they provide?
forsale [732]

All people paid the same amount in factor payments for the resources they provide because different resources have different value.

<h3>What makes each economic system different from one another?</h3>

Traditional systems are characterized by a concentration on the fundamentals of products, services, and labor, and they are shaped by customs and beliefs. While a market system is governed by forces of supply and demand, command systems are influenced by centralized authorities. Finally, mixed economies combine market and command systems.

The money that individuals receive in exchange for providing producing inputs like land, labor, or capital. Patriotism. the ardor that drives someone to serve their country; love of one's country.

<h3>Which economy is better for society?</h3>

The reason capitalism is the best economic system is that it offers everybody in society a variety of advantages and chances. A few of these advantages involve fostering riches and innovation, enhancing people's quality of life, and empowering the populace.

To know more about patriotism visit :

brainly.com/question/14855779

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
Crane Company adopted the dollar-value LIFO method of inventory valuation on December 31, 2019. Its inventory at that date was $
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

See below

Explanation:

Crane corporation

Ending inventory

2019 $1,120,000

2020 $1,271,000/1.08 = $1,176,852

Ending inventory [$1,120,000+ (1,176,852 - $1,120,000)× 1.08]

= [$1,120,000 + $61,400]

= $1,181,400

2021 $1,417,000/1.26 = $1,124,603

2022 $1,623,000/1.31 = $1,238,931

Ending inventory [$1,124,603 + ($114,328 × 1.31)]

= $1,124,603 + $149,770

= $1,274,373

Therefore, the cost of the ending inventory at December 31, 2020 under dollar value LIFO would be $1,274,373

5 0
3 years ago
What are the business reasons behind john deere's offshoring of tractor production from the u. S. To other countries?
Yuri [45]

Reasons for shifting production to other countries John Deere is a global leader in the tractor market and its strategic objective is to expand rapidly outside of North America. One of the ways to expand globally is to make the product closer to the target market

Offshoring is the practice of a firm moving its service and production operations to a different nation. A corporation with American roots, John Deere is well recognised for assembling and producing agricultural tractors.

Samuel Allen, the company's CEO, predicts that Offshoring the company's tractor manufacture overseas will boost overall sales to $50 billion by 2018, with half of that amount coming from nations other than the US and Canada. Offshoring production would aid in growing the business to a worldwide scale in addition to boosting revenue.

Due to differences in time zones, the company's production processes and services would be available around the clock. The cost of manufacture would also be reduced by offshore tractor production.

The business would stop paying the costs of transporting tractors from the base production site to foreign nations. The need to exert more control, an effort to reduce risks, and a desire to concentrate on business development are some further justifications for outsourcing.

To learn more about offshoring here,

brainly.com/question/22541228

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Use the following information to determine the ending cash balance to be reported on the month ended June 30 cash budget.a. Begi
    11·1 answer
  • Your firm is a U.K.-based importer of bicycles. You have placed an order with an Italian firm for €1,000,000 worth of bicycles.
    6·1 answer
  • An insurance contract must comply with the "Principle of Indemnity". Jarron's friend Nick, accidentally destroys Jarron's laptop
    11·1 answer
  • Fergie has the choice between investing in a State of New York bond at 9.4 percent and a Surething Inc. bond at 12.0 percent. As
    10·1 answer
  • An agency relationship can degenerate into an agency conflict when an agent acts in a manner that is not in the best interest of
    10·2 answers
  • What type of life policy covers two people and pays upon the death of the last insured?
    8·1 answer
  • This term refers to the percentage of the civilian workforce who are available for a job but do not have one.
    12·1 answer
  • Assume that tea and lemons are complements and that coffee and tea are substitutes. An effective price ceiling on coffee would c
    6·1 answer
  • Ecology Co. sells a biodegradable product called Dissol and has predicted the following sales for the first four months of the c
    11·1 answer
  • g In order to increase the responsiveness of a forecast made using the moving average technique, the number of data points in th
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!