Answer: option (A).
Explanation: A social network is a social structure that derives its existence from the social interactions through which people define and redefine its character. Social network is a social structure made up of a set of social actors, sets of dyadic ties, and other social interactions between actors. social networks is useful in the social sciences to study relationships between individuals, groups, or organizations.
Answer:
There are two communication models:
- The transactional
- The linear
The transactional model is bi-directional and happens, when one person or subsystem interacts and the second one interacts back.
The linear communication model happens when the sender creates a message with the correct channel code and sends it out to the audience.
Explanation:
Linear model of communication is rather basic as the sender interacts with the receiver, but transactional model builds upon it two people communicating to one another simultaneously.
The transactional model or circular model, is used for interpersonal communication the sender can encode the message in writing or as a speech, aiming to convey information to a receiver, who will decode it reading or listening, taking turns each time.
Barnlund's transactional model varies by means that it is a multi-layered feedback system. The sender and the receiver are in the same level of continuous interchange process and the feedback for one is the message for the other.
Answer:
C. that people disagree on whether to allow animal testing
Explanation:
There's two sides of arguments..one side says "Scientists should be allowed to continue testing products on animals." and other side says "Scientists should establish testing procedures that do not involve animals."
There's a clear disagreement on whether to allow animal testing.
Answer:
If you search ancient india flocabulary quiz it will pop up on quizlet
Explanation:
Gotcha and not with those textbook definitions.
Lets say we own a herd of goat. I dont even know if you can have herd of goat or if its called something but back to the point,
In a democratic society, every goat would have an equal chance to represent who they want to be their rancher. They can express their views openly without any legal prosecution. However, they dont just choose one person to lead them. Lets say that theres a group of white colored goats. These goats can vote for one goat to represent them as whole. Same with the brown-colored goat. Same with the black-colored goat.
(And no, please, if someone takes this as racist then I am done. That is not what im going for)
Now an autocratic society has the rancher with absolute power (like a dictator). He can control everything to his needs and he does not need to benefit the majority of the people, only the people that will keep him in power (which is why there is no such thing as a Dictator that will help the people. If he does help the people, he loses the support of his closest allies who had him in power, and he is now tossed out of power).
Finally, an oligarchic is a bit harder to represent with goats but lets say we had some European Goats and some American Goats who used to be European. They decided to sail across the sea to find "new land" and start there own government... But of course, that European Goat sees the American Soil that the goats now herd on as having lots and lots of grass, which is depleted in Europe due to the large amount of Goats. They decide to create a charter to grant the American Goats rights to the land only if they send grass back home.
I hope this helps people understand these concepts as I just really came up with the metaphors for it and wow, I already love my own post