my where the hell is the freakin question??
Answer:
<em>priming </em>
Explanation:
<em>In psychology,</em><em> the term 'priming' is defined as one of the "implicit memories effects" whereby exposure to a particular stimulus influences different responses to a stimulus that comes later on. Priming is considered as a technique which is being used to instruct an individual's memory in negative as well as positive ways.</em>
<em>In reference to the given question, the statement's result demonstrates "priming".</em>
It is false, because the law is based on core ideas of ethics, actually. In common law, cases are determined with the help of the past decisions. Those decisions are also based on past decisions and so on. It shows that timeline doesn't matter; what matters is just the rules and principles of law.
Both yes and no. Yes as in the massacre happened and many of the people shot civilians during the massacre. They weren't as in Captain Preston was found not guilty and many historians believe that he did not order the soldiers to attack but that the soldiers attacked of their own free will. There are even many who claim that it was self defense and that nobody was guilty except for the colonists.
