Answer:
James Madison
Explanation:
HJames Madison, based on his experience and knowledge, he concluded that there is dangers inherent in the powerful state legislatures and of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Thus, in the year 1787, in his essay, Federalist 45, Madison developed an argument about whether the expanded powers of the national government benefits or hinders policy making.
He argued that the proper division of power itself hinder the threats to our liberties because officials at both levels of government; state and federal, would jostle for citizens’ favour.
The definition of a developed country is "a sovereign state that has a highly developed economy and advanced technological infrastructure relative to other less industrialized nations."
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Argue a case for appointing judges and then argue a case for having them elected.
In the case of appointing judges, many experts agree on the idea that appointed is better because judges have to be neutral. They serve the Constitution, they do not serve any political party or particular interests.
Once appointed, the judges are going to ratify, so it is supposed that their integrity is double-checked.
In other cases, some arguments favor the election of judges, stating that people should be trusted to elect judges. Through this election, judges will be driven to serve the people who put their trust in them to impart justice.
If they are elected, some voices agree that judges should be elected for a determined period, so people could evaluate if they did a good during their tenure.
However, in both cases, some advantages and disadvantages have to be resolved by law experts and politicians in their respective states.
