The remains of a teenage girl, aged 15–17 at her death, and nicknamed <u>"Naia"</u>, <em><u>that are more than 12,000 years old</u></em>, were inside a flooded cave located near <em><u>Tulum, Quintana Roo in Mexico</u></em>. They were recovered in 2007 by the cavers Alejandro Álvarez, Alberto Nava and Franco Attolini, of the<em><u> Tulum Speleological Project (PET)</u></em>, dedicated to the registry of the underwater heritage of the region. After seven years of research, a multidisciplinary team from USA, Canada and Mexico, whose principal investigator of the research on <u>"Naia"</u>, <em><u>James Chatters</u></em>, an archaeologist and paleontologist, reported in 2014, that <u>"Naia</u>" has already contributed to understand the origins of the first Americans and her DNA <em><u>confirms the idea that "a single group of Asian emigrants gave rise to both the earliest American settlers and modern Native Americans"</u></em>. <u>So, right answer is B. Members from one single, genetically uniform population populated the Americas from at least 16,000 years ago.</u>
The answer is: <span>Be cost-effective, support the mission of the organization, requires a comprehensive and integrated approach
The nist sp 800-14 filled with the general Expectation that must be filled for an information technology system to be sued by a private corporation or </span><span>government agency. cost-effective and comprehensiveness will ensure that the benefit from using the technology will outweigh the cost</span>
Answer:
The Wilmot Proviso was a piece of legislation proposed by David Wilmot (D-FS-R PA) at the close of the Mexican-American War. If passed, the Proviso would have outlawed slavery in territory acquired by the United States as a result of the war, which included most of the Southwest and extended all the way to California.
Explanation:
Answer: A is the correct answer
Explanation: hope this helps
That is right, you would be using "peer" testimony.A man who gives peer testimony may not have ability in a specific field, but rather he or she likely has personal involvement with the current issue. In spite of the fact that peer testimony can without much of a stretch be tested, it can be a capable device in influencing a crowd of people, especially when conveyed or given by a very famous big name.
