1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maslowich
3 years ago
8

I WILL PICK BRAINLIEST

History
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
7 0

Hamilton, Madison, and Washington
Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and George Washington were advocates of the federal system.
In their attempt to balance order with liberty, the Founders identified several reasons for creating a federalist government:

to avoid tyranny
to allow more participation in politics
to use the states as "laboratories" for new ideas and programs.
You might be interested in
Can anyone help with this?
omeli [17]
What exactly are you supposed to put in the blanks?
4 0
3 years ago
How did China rebuild its empire after years of war?
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

They worked very hard.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the factors which brought The first world War?​
yanalaym [24]

1. Friends don’t let friends fight alone

A tangled web of strong political alliances among nations meant that most great powers felt obliged to help their partners once war was declared.

After the murder of an Austrian Archduke by Serbian assassins, Austria-Hungary prepared for war against Serbia, which was allied with Russia.

Once Russia mobilized, Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, declared war on both Russia and Russia’s ally, France. Great Britain and its empire, sympathetic to France, declared war on Germany (Canada was not consulted).

Alliances originally intended as defensive pacts ended up looking threatening to outsiders. This perilous network of allegiances is an accepted part of all narratives about the First World War. German historian Andreas Hilgruber was one of many who showed how dangerous and costly all of these alliances were.

2. Armed to the teeth

Europe in 1914 was armed to the teeth. Vast fleets of warships were being constructed, conscription was implemented in most of the great powers to allow large armies to be kept in reserve, weapons and ammunition were stockpiled, and detailed war plans were made.

The impact of the proliferation of the instruments of war as a cause of the outbreak of the conflict was highlighted by David Stevenson’s Armaments and the Coming of War (1996). A large army spoiling for a fight may well seek one out.

3. Capitalist imperialism

During the First World War, Vladimir Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, wrote an essay entitled Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), in which he laid out the foundation of his own philosophy of communism.

He believed that the war was the product of capitalist financial monopolies within states, which created national rivalries and led the great powers into a destructive conflict over access to raw materials and undeveloped markets.

Others since have blamed imperialism itself and commercial interests.

4. War on a tight schedule

A.J.P. Taylor, one of the 20th century’s great historians, argued in War by Timetable (1969) that in 1914, thanks to relatively new transportation (railroad) and communications (telegraph and telephone) technologies, every European power believed that the ability to mobilize their armies faster than their neighbours would by itself deter war.

Every power drafted elaborate mobilization timetables so that they could outrace their potential opponents. When the crisis of 1914 occurred, none of the leaders really wanted war, according to Taylor, but each felt they had to mobilize faster than the others or lose the advantage.

They became the victims of their own logistical preparations, and Europe slid unwillingly but relentlessly into war. Barbara Tuchman’s book The Guns of August (1962) similarly identified the dangers of technology in causing conflicts to escalate rapidly.

5. Blame Germany

In the Treaty of Versailles that officially ended the war, Germany was made to accept the blame for causing the conflict, and after that German governments spent decades denying their sole responsibility.

They convinced many people, but after the Second World War, German historian Fritz Fischer looked into previously-classified archives for the first time. Fischer concluded in his book German War Aims in the First World War (1961) that Imperial Germany had deliberately provoked a general war as part of a policy of conquest much like that undertaken by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany 20 years later.

Fischer’s conclusions remain controversial to this day.

6. No, blame Britain

The idea that Britain caused the war was the live grenade that firebrand historian Niall Ferguson lobbed into the debate when he wrote The Pity of War (1999), though Paul Schroeder had put forward a similar argument earlier.

Ferguson claimed that not only did British statesmen encourage France and Russia to oppose Germany, but that Britain’s own intervention turned a regional European brawl into a global war.

The British may not have directly started it, according to Ferguson, but they were liable for greatly expanding the scope of the war and making it drag on as long as it did.

7. People being people

Canadian historian Margaret Macmillan has published a major book, The War That Ended Peace (2013), which presents a synthesis of many different factors: alliances and power politics; reckless diplomacy; ethnic nationalism; and, most of all, the personal character and relationships of the almost uncountable number of historical figures who had a hand in the coming of war.

Her work helps to highlight the fact that for all the great and powerful forces that seemed to grind the world inexorably into war in 1914, everything ultimately came down to the beliefs, prejudices, rivalries, and schemes of a great array of personalities and people.

3 0
3 years ago
What is meant by the quote that Henry Ford "freed common people from the limitations of their geography"?
ira [324]
<span>This means that people are able to learn about difference religions quickly no matter where they live.  i </span>hope i helped
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would most likely be part of Romanesque architecture?Flying buttresses
sasho [114]
Well, the first 2 were in the Gothic period which was after the one you are asking about. Also, Stone masonry has been around for longer than that period. I would say C.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are two effects of Earth's magnetic field?
    9·1 answer
  • How did business change from 1840 to 1900 ? during the industrial revolution, American worker traded in farm work for the factor
    14·1 answer
  • The domino theory during the post world war 2 era that
    15·2 answers
  • What led to the creation of magna carta, known as the cornerstone of modern english law?
    5·1 answer
  • An increase of currency in relation to the amount of goods available resulting in higher prices is called
    9·2 answers
  • HELPPPP!!!!! YOULL BE BRAINLIEST AN GET 50 POINTSS
    10·2 answers
  • The minister in Harriet's hometown was part of the Underground Railroad
    13·2 answers
  • Lets just simp for a moment
    7·1 answer
  • How does the Securities and Exchange Commission help promote transparency and responsibility in the
    5·1 answer
  • What are political parties? Why did the authors of the Constitution want to avoid them?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!