The statement is<u> false</u> that successful as they were on rivers and lakes, steamboats were never able to cross the <em>Atlantic</em>
<em />
<h3>What made steamboats successful? </h3>
Steamboat was not able to <u>cross</u> the Atlantic due to the use of a large amount of coal in it. However, with the invention of technology, the <u>hybrid steamboat </u>was designed during <em>1818.</em>
Therefore, the boat was named Savannah that crossed Atlantic to sail in the year of 1819.
Learn more about steamboats here:
brainly.com/question/1007031
Answer: leader Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna; theres you answer.
sorry if I did it twice my computer was lagging.
<u>Answer:</u>
C- The water was a constant shallow sea during that time.
This was happened to the Grand Canyon area during the Permian Age.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Grand canyon consists of the most studied sequence and complete rock on earth. They are nearly 200 million to 2 billion of years old, of which most of them were deposited in shallow, warm seas and near the ancient and the sea shores which were long gone.
The youngest formation of rock in the grand canyon is the Kaibab Limestone, which was laid down during the Permian age by the advancing warm and shallow sea. Although, the areas climate has been changing constantly during recent times from cool and wet pluvial to semi arid conditions. And also, with less water to cut, the erosion has also reduced greatly.
between a strong central government and the public interest."It is rather to argue that in politics there are no immaculate conceptions, and that in the drive for a stronger general government motives of all sorts played a part, common good or public interest that militated against their private status."
Answer:
revolutionary movement (or revolutionary social movement) is a specific type of social movement dedicated to carrying out a revolution. Charles Tilly defines it as "a social movement advancing exclusive competing claims to control of the state, or some segment of it".[1] Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper define it more simply (and consistently with other works[2][need quotation to verify]) as "a social movement that seeks, as minimum, to overthrow the government or state".[3]
A social movement may want to make various reforms and to gain some control of the state, but as long as they do not aim for an exclusive control, its members are not revolutionary.[4] Social movements may become more radical and revolutionary, or vice versa - revolutionary movements can scale down their demands and agree to share powers with others, becoming a run-of-the-mill political party.[4]
