1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hammer [34]
2 years ago
6

What are some limitations to tribal self-governance?

History
1 answer:
Vika [28.1K]2 years ago
7 0

The tribal self-governance comes with some limitations, some of which are slow social progress, ineffective healthcare, and partial power over the governed territory.

Explanation:

There are many areas that have the states of reserves, which basically mean they are areas where the indigenous tribes have members living there, practice their own lifestyle, and have self-governing (in most cases). The governments have basically granted these lands to the indigenous people, and they enjoy great autonomy. The people in the reserves are self-governing, thus they make their own rules and laws.

While this may seem good, it doesn't come without problems in practice. The organization is often on very low level, which in turn makes the governing of the area of low quality, and the people often tend to abuse that. The social progress also tends to be somewhat weird and not achieving what has been the initial purpose. The healthcare is too on very low level, which leads to much higher death rates, both in adults and infants. The prime reason for this is practicing the traditional medicine. While the traditional medicine is very effective for some things and even outperforms the pharmaceuticals, for some things it just doesn't have proper solution.

Learn more about autonomy brainly.com/question/536789

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
In the House of Representatives, what is reapportionment?
Whitepunk [10]
The numbers of electors in each state
4 0
3 years ago
How did the u.s intervene mexico
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]

Explanation:

The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.

7 0
3 years ago
1. How can Georgia citizens best influence Georgia's<br> government?
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

Petitions, Rallies, Signs infront of ur local state agencies, websites, talking to ur governments officals advisors, talking to said officals urself! Gathering and forming an organization, etc. Hope that helps!

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did many Americans feel that the result of the 1824 election was fraudulent
Mama L [17]
New laws were enacted requiring voting men to own.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1)Why did the Europeans need to create colonies in different regions of the world to fuel their economic development? 2) What do
matrenka [14]

Answer:

By extracting minerals from that colonies in order to support their economy.

Explanation:

The Europeans need to create colonies in different regions of the world in order to fuel their economy by extracting minerals from that colonies. The "sun never sets on the British Empire" means that British Empire will never end or weaken. The colony ruled by direct rule means that the other country captured the land and rule over there while indirect rule means that the other country set out their men to run the government. I want to live in a French colony rather than British colony because French impose low taxes on the citizens of colony.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the importance of the fossil record
    9·2 answers
  • If you can guess my name you will get what you most want in life
    8·2 answers
  • How did Confucianism impact the relationship between king and subject?
    10·1 answer
  • Which one of the Five Pillars of Islam refers to giving to the poor and needy?
    6·1 answer
  • I NEED ASAP....... Select the correct answer. Israel has a president and a prime minister. The legislature in Israel is called t
    8·1 answer
  • Where did secretary of state brian kemp go to high school?
    6·1 answer
  • Where does congress derive authority for its so called “implied powers”?
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the effects the Treaty of Versailles had on the Chinese people and what was the
    15·1 answer
  • 25 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST HELP ASAP MY MOM GONNA GROUND ME IF I DONT GET GOOD GRADE
    5·2 answers
  • What name wa given to the ma movement of African-American from the Southern to the northern citie
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!