delegint restraining my answer so yeah
Answer: 3
Explanation: I’m sorry I don’t know 2 but 3 is Peasants 90% of people worked as them.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Answer:
d. reaction formation.
Explanation:
Reaction formation: In psychology, the term "reaction formation" is described as one of the defense mechanism which is considered as one of the different parts of the psychoanalytic theory and was introduced by Sigmund Freud.
Reaction formation is referred to as a process through which an individual tends to perceives his or her true or genuine desires or feelings to be legally or socially acceptable and therefore he or she attempts to convince oneself and other persons that the opposite of a particular thing is true.
In the question above, Ben best illustrates the use of reaction formation.
The correct answer is A. Both are responsible for communicating with the state governments goodluck
