Answer:
Income Statement for Swing Hard Incorporated for the month ended February 28.
Sales $20,935
Less Expenses
Wages ($2,600)
Electricity ($1,420)
Net Income / (Loss) $16,915
Net profit margin = 80.8%
Explanation:
<em>Income Statement for Swing Hard Incorporated for the month ended February 28.</em>
Sales ($20,600 + $155 + $180) $20,935
Less Expenses
Wages ($2,600)
Electricity ($1,420)
Net Income / (Loss) $16,915
<em>Company's net profit margin</em>
Net profit margin = net profit / sales × 100
= $16,915 / $20,935 × 100
= 80.8%
Note
The Income Statement is always prepared on <em>accrual basis of accounting</em> meaning Revenues and Expenses must the recorded when they occur or incur not as when they are paid.
(12-6)/12 gives you the growth rate *over five years* (115%)
divide that by 5 and you get an average rate of 23% growth per year.
If we’re rounding, yes, that statement is correct. Otherwise, growth over five years doubled because there was a growth of 115% and year-over-year growth was 23%.
<span>Ban-lore In Entry Exclusive Dwnershlp Government- ol' a Key mated Economies Scenarlo Raoul-an Honopollel of Scale In order to own and opelate a taxi, drivers are required to obtain a taxi medallion. ’7 ’3‘ ’7‘ The Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) formerly controlled all U.S. sources of bauxite, a key component In the production of aluminum. Given that Alcoa did not sell bauxite to any other h h n companlu, Alcoa was a monopolist in the U.5. aluminum industry from the Iatchnineteenth ' century until the 19405. In the natural gas industry, low average total oosls are obtained only through large-scale production. In other words, the initial oost of setting up all the necessary pipes and hoses makes F‘- r‘ ”i“- it risky and, most likely, unprofitable for competitors to enter me market.</span>
Answer:
a. $112,000
b. $7,500
Explanation:
(a) transferred out
Units transferred out are 100% complete for both materials and conversion costs, thus multiply the Total Cost per Equivalent units with the number of units transferred.
Cost of units transferred out = $8 × 14,000 units
= $112,000
(b) in ending work in process
Units of ending work in process are 100% complete in terms of materials ( since materials are entered at the beginning of the process) whilst 25% complete in terms on conversion cost (applied uniformly during production).
Cost of ending work in process
Materials ($3 × 2,000 units) = $6,000
Conversion ($3 × (2,000 units × 25%)) = $1,500
Total Cost = $7,500
