Explanation:
November 12: Out of 100 new tourist destinations selected by the government, Karnali Province alone consists of 21 destinations. The Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation recently announced the list of the destinations having tourism potential but requiring promotion. Though Karnali Province is geographically backward, it is rich in natural beauty. The province is considered to be religiously, historically, culturally and archeologically rich.
Seven tourist destinations from five districts of Karnalai have been included in the list that needs to be promoted. Similarly, 14 destinations from 10 districts have been included in the new destinations that are to be developed.
Shey Phoksundo National Park of Dolpa, Sinja Sabhyata of Jumla, Rara lake of Mugu, Panchakoshi Jwala Area and Kakrebihar, Deutibajai and Madan Ashrit Park of Surkhet fall under the destinations to be established and promoted.
Similarly, destinations like Kupinde lake of Salyan, Dudul Chaitya of Jumla, Limi Upatyaka of Humla, Rara- Shey Phoksundo Trail, Panchal fall of Kalikot, Khalanga Durbar of Jajarkot, Kotgadhi-Panchal-Belaspur-Mahabu Tourism Development Area of Dailekh, Jajura lake of Surkhet, Guptilal, Bhadale cave, Shiva cave, Gidde danda and Rukum’s Chitripatan have been selected as the new destinations that need to be developed. Majority of the 14 new destinations to be developed are less popular.
Answer: Miranda Verses Arizona was a landmark case in US Supreme Court.
Explanation:
This case presented the fifth amendment of US constitution, which states that the suspect or culprit has own rights to be presented himself or herself in court of law and deeds of self incrimination will not be accepted. According to this amendment the constitution restricts the interrogation related to police custody to be presented as evidence. As the police may manipulate the facts and may try to threatened the suspect for conviction. It also suggests that the suspect also has a right to discuss about the case with the attorney during and before the trial,
The answer would be D) because it says in the answer that for ourselves and basically our generations after us.
Based on enhancing intimate communication of Notarious and Markman the answer letter (<span>d) couples should ask for help from a third person if the discussion turns into an argument.
There are arguments of married couples that are too deep to handle. This would require a third person who is unbiased and capable to give solution to their marital problem</span>