The long-term impact of Martin Luther's break from the Catholic Church was the division of Christianity into many factions and groups. We see many Protestant churches today as a result of his "revolution."
Luther had not intended to break away from the Roman Catholic Church; he wanted to reform it and restore it to what he saw as a proper foundation on the Bible. But Rome did not agree with him, and ultimately a new church, the Lutheran Church, formed. There also were other Protestant reformers, and other new churches developed from their teachings and influence.
Another point might be made: Luther emphasized the individual's freedom of conscience to believe what he thought the Word of God was saying. Though Luther did not intend it as a political movement, this began thoughts in the direction of freedom of speech and conscience in social life. The historian Philip Schaff has said that the Reformation "marks the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of modern times. Starting from religion, it gave, directly or indirectly, a mighty impulse to every forward movement, and made Protestantism the chief propelling force in the history of modern civilization."
For more details on Schaff's point, read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/11464108#readmore
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be 3.3 percent (3.3%). <span>In 2010, the poorest 20% of american families earned 3.3% of the country's total income for the year. Other options in this question include 25%, 50.2%, 65.5% and 85%. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.</span>
Christians wanted to regain control of the Holy Land from Muslims.
Answer: driving the speed limit
Explanation:
Following the rule of law refers to obeying an actual law that is implemented in a society. Speed limits are actual laws so when we drive the speed limit, we are following the rule of law.
The other options are not correct because they are not based on actual laws. They are simply based on the civil and environmental responsibilities. There is no law for instance, that forces us to vote or to recycle or to get a driver's license (unless you are driving in which case this is a law).
Answer:
The last time Congress enacted sweeping immigration reform was back in 1986. That bill, signed by Ronald Reagan, looked a lot like the proposals being put forward today. There was a path to citizenship for existing illegal immigrants, coupled with tighter border enforcement.
