It's called a chapter,and it makes your book
Answer:
<em>I remember when I was 5, my family went fishing with my great grandpa, of course I was really little and kinda afriad of the hook and fish, so I sat out, and just watched as my big brother and great grandpa as they were fishing, I was sitting down looking at all the pretty rocks, when I heard my dad say move _____, </em><em>(Put your name there)</em><em> I did not move, my dad came running near me and I saw a water-snake, my dad picked it up and chucked it back into the water, it came back again, and he chucked it again, he did it 2 more times till the water-snake gave up, I hugged my dad, and my grandpa of couse made a joke and said, "Hey we could"ve ate that!" The End! </em>
<em />
Please keep in mind this is a real memerey I had, so this is not made up, I forgot where the place was, I was really little. And this is kinda short, it is a vauge memery.
<em />
Answer:
Summary Of Rethinking The Wild By Christopher Solomon Essay
1530 Words7 Pages
Humanity co-exists with nature in a relationship that periodically shifts between symbiotic and parasitic. We maintain this relationship in order to survive. In exchange, we carefully monitor how our behavior alters the natural environment and affects those living within it. This responsibility is the price we pay for our species’ sentience and dominance. To help fulfill our duty, America established the 1954 Wilderness Act in hopes of becoming passive “guardians” of nature instead of encroaching “gardeners.” However, the Wilderness Act has failed. In his article, “Rethinking the Wild”, Christopher Solomon questions the effectiveness of the law and correctly concludes that, after fifty years of dormancy, mankind must take an active role in environmental protection, the role of the gardener. Though critics may argue that the passivity of the “guardian” should be maintained, realistically, little can be done to preserve the environment when we refuse to do anything. Because mankind has a greater stake in the wilderness than we realize, we must assume a proactive role in protecting the wilderness out of respect for nature and our own ethical standards.
Boundaries and Investments
Assume for the sake of our argument that nature holds no intrinsic value. Why, then, is the wilderness worth protecting? Truthfully, the wilderness can be a valuable indicator of the planet’s overall health, which is not easily gauged in industrialized and populated areas due to human influence.
Since there is no choice options, there could be lots of different answers like: survivers, travelers, etc. It all depends, can you put the options (if there is any) in the comments of my question? Then i can answer, thanks!
Answer:
The U.S. government gives power to the citizens.
Explanation:
Democracy is considered to have originated from Athens, in Ancient Greece.
Democracy can be defined as a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
There are two (2) main types of democracy and these include;
I. Representative democracy: it's also known as indirect democracy and can be defined as a form of government which typically involves the process of having the citizens of a particular country vote to elect representatives (political leaders) to enact laws, create policies and make decisions on their behalf.
II. Direct democracy: it can be defined as a process which typically involves the candidates voting for their preferred choice. Thus, their choices are reflected directly on the subject matter.
Generally, the type of government in which legislators such as senators or house of representative members are found is known as a democracy and they are saddled with the responsibility of enacting or making laws.
Hence, the statement which describes a way that Athenian democracy influenced the US government is that, the U.S. government gives power to the citizens through representative democracy.
