Answer:
Even though this question is missing the options, after analyzing the revision we can safely say it was made for <u>conciseness</u>.
Explanation:
Conciseness can be simply defined as saying a lot in just a few words. Notice how the original paragraph is much longer than the revised one. The writer gave much more information than what was truly necessary. Details such as "and that new procedures need to be initiated" and "who was sympathetic" are superfluous. The first one adds nothing of value. If the procedures are inadequate, it is quite obvious that new ones need to be initiated. Readers could infer that. The second one is permeated with subjectivity, not only making the paragraph longer, but also stating an opinion that in uncalled for in this context. By eliminating the extra words, the writer made the paragraph concise, using fewer words to express the necessary.
A pular is more than one in number. and a singular is <span>exceptionally good or great; remarkable.</span>
The issue of integrity is that the company is ignoring her civil rights as an individual.
In this case, the woman is sexually harassed by a top-level senior executive in a large company. There should be a higher moral standard for the company itself, this executive is going to present an inappropriate image for the company.
The woman can decline the settlement amount and continue with the sexual harassment case or that she can accept the settlement, keep her job. She should not collect the money and continue the case. This will help in putting an end to the act.
Learn more about integrity on:
brainly.com/question/1188458
For the introduction introduced the play, bring up the meaning of betrayal and mention that Julius was betrayed. But don't explain it all there, you can go more into detail about that stuff in the following paragraphs. For the concluding paragraph you can briefly summarize what you had written, but don't bring up any new information at all.
