He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
Answer:
C. Add a period after fossil
Explanation:
The reader can easily deduce that this is a run-on sentence.
"Look at this fossil," Is a full stop on itself, and the thought can end there.
The next phrase can be continued in a separate sentence by itself.
Many people seem to be confused as to why the answer isn't B, and I'll gladly explain why!
The sentence goes, "Look at this fossil I bought it at the gift shop.."
"It," causes the sentence to become a run-on, and therefore isn't grammatically correct.
However, if the sentence said, "Look at this fossil I bought at the gift shop," then it would have no need to be changed, as it is a full sentence in itself with no run-on.
Another thing to note is that some of you may be thinking, "But (insert grammar checker) said it was fine by itself!"
I'm sorry to break it to you, <em>but a grammar checker doesn't have 100% guaranteed results. </em>Many grammar checkers do not possess the ability to catch run-on sentences and are not a credible source of information.
I hope this clears things up!
The two quotations that show these events took place many years ago are "Many, many centuries ago..." and "...he showed men how to build fires for themselves.."
<h3>What is a quotation?</h3>
We can define a quotation as a passage taken from someone else's text and used in another text. Quotations are, in a way, a copy of the same exact words used by the original author. Whenever we use a quotation in our own work, we must give the author due credit.
Here, we are to analyze the quotations provided in the answer choices and choose the two that support the idea that the events narrated took place many years ago. Therefore, we can choose the following quotations:
- "Many, many centuries ago there lived a Titan named Prometheus.” (paragraph 1)
- “On Earth, he showed men how to build fires for themselves, and it was not long before they began to do all the wonderful things of which Prometheus had dreamed.” (paragraph 10)
The first quotation is the most obvious one, since it uses the words "many, many centuries ago." Now, the second quotation is a bit trickier, but we can see that it indicates the events took place many years ago because it speaks of a time when men were not able to build fires by themselves.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answers provided above are correct.
Learn more about quotations here:
brainly.com/question/2762082
#SPJ1
The Douglas Fir and Other Evergreen Trees Should Be right
