Answer:
In the commissioner form of government, the legislative and executive functions are performed by the elected commission.
Explanation:
A commission-type government is one in which there is no defined mayor or legislative council, but a commission in which its members do not exercise the legislative function or the administration, but both together. Thus, the commission creates the laws, their regulations and also governs their application. In this way, only the judicial sphere remains outside its power, but everything related to government is fully exercised by the commission.
Generally, these commissions are made up of 6 or more members, of which one is appointed mayor for the purposes of representation, but does not have a greater power than the rest.
Rome was a republic and a monarchy
Greece was a democracy and oligarchy
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
I Am Almost Positive That The Answer Is C
Hope This Helps !
