1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
3 years ago
8

What is different about the law making process at the state level from the federal level?

Law
1 answer:
Snezhnost [94]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

state law:

The senator signs the entire bill, signs with detail vetoes, vetoes the bill, or pocket vetoes the bill. council for reevaluation. A 66% vote of both the senate and the house is required to topple a veto. In the event that the senator signs, or the two chambers abrogate the representative's veto… bill becomes a law

federal level:

When a bill is presented, it is alloted to a board whose individuals will look into, examine, and make changes to the bill. The bill is then put before that chamber to be decided on. ... On the off chance that the president decides to veto a bill, as a rule Congress can cast a ballot to abrogate that veto and the bill turns into a law.

You might be interested in
Protection against being tried for the same crime multiple times is part of which
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

Fifth

Explanation:

That's called double jeopardy, which is explained in the 5th amendment.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Individual rights must be balanced against the values of society at large. For instance, the right to free speech must be balanc
azamat

<u>Explanation:</u>

Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid

In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
A lawyer is suing a structural engineer on behalf of a client for $250,000 who’s garage slid off a hillside because of the struc
jeka94

Answer:

The types of damages that would be needed in order for them to be equally happy as they were before the garage fiasco are:

a) Compensatory damages

b) Consequential damages

Explanation:

a) Compensatory Damages are claims paid to directly to compensate the non-breaching party for the value of what was damaged, not done, or performed.  For this purpose, compensatory damages will be equal to the cost of getting the garages fixed.

b) Consequential Damages address the costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of damages done to other facilities.  Example, the sliding off of the garage could have led to flood water damaging some other property, which were not the direct subject of the claim.

8 0
3 years ago
Road rage is a term often used to describe the act of a physical assault that arrives from a
uysha [10]
Answer a hope it helps
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What evidence led authorities to believe Jimmy committed the crime?
    5·1 answer
  • Methods of controlling mosquito breed<br>​
    7·2 answers
  • The largest and most prominent collection of law enforcement agencies, including the United States Marshals Service; the Federal
    12·1 answer
  • Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
    13·1 answer
  • What role do committees play in the policymaking process?
    15·2 answers
  • If two people attempt the same maneuver, what determines the amount of force that each is required to exert?
    14·1 answer
  • Has this video prompted you to make any changes in the way that you view or manage your personal finances? Do you think it will
    10·1 answer
  • What type of gov do these terms describe?
    9·1 answer
  • Developing appropriate attitudes depends on recognizing that attitudes are _.
    14·1 answer
  • Samuel works as a private security guard. While hiring Samuel a year back, his high-profile client thoroughly checked whether Sa
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!