What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
I’m pretty sure the answer is B but it could possibly be C
Answer:
The fifth amendment and the eighth amendment
Explanation:
The fifth amendment prohibit the government to force someone to testify against their self. The eighth amendment states no cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The Temporal lobe is responsible
Answer:
The neutrality policy.
Explanation:
When the war blowed, President Wilson declared that the United States will follow a strict neutrality policy where it wouldn´t ally with other countries. This policy lasted three years.
