1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
2 years ago
11

Ông Hạnh là cán bộ miền nam tập kết ra Bắc năm 1954, trước khi đi ông đã có vợ là bà Hảo và 1 con gái tên Linh. Ở miền Bắc một t

hời gian, ông Hạnh xây dựng gia đình với cô Hoa, sinh ra 2 người con là Bích và Thái. Sau năm 1975, ông trở về miền Nam nhưng vẫn thương yêu và trông nom vợ và hai con ở miền Bắc. Tháng 7/2005, biết mình tuổi cao sức yếu, ông lập di chúc xác định ông có 600 triệu đồng. Vì các con đều khôn lớn, có gia đình riêng nên ông chỉ để cho bà Hảo 50 triệu đồng, cho bà Hoa 100 triệu đồng, số còn lại ông đề nghị chuyển cho hội chữ thập đỏ tỉnh H. Anh (chị) hãy chia tài sản trong trường hợp nêu trên vả giải thích cách chia đó.
Law
1 answer:
Sergio039 [100]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: bangtan

Explanation: armyyy

You might be interested in
Dabney v. State
alexgriva [62]

The Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary is that thinking of the crime does not make you a criminal and thus, the defendant can not be convicted of a non-exsitence crime.

<h3>What is the case of Dabney v. State?</h3>

The defender "Dabney" was convicted for attempt 4th degree burglary but appealed on the grounds he did not actually commit it.

Hence, he could not be convicted of actus reus of being on the property no criminal significance in its own right absent the mens rea of an intent to commit theft.

Read more about Dabney v. State

brainly.com/question/26537644

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 6
butalik [34]

Answer:

It was a part of the spoils system also known as political patronage. They would be called political patrons.

3 0
3 years ago
Un cambio a la constitución?
zheka24 [161]

Respuesta: Una enmienda

Explicación:

Una enmienda se refiere a cualquier modificación o cambio en un documento legal incluyendo una ley o incluso una constitución (documento que resume los principios y leyes de una nación). En el caso de una enmienda a la constitución el propósito de estas es adaptar las leyes y principios constitucionales a nuevas realidades o modificar aquellos que con el tiempo han resultado obsoletos e ineficientes. De esta forma la constitución logra adaptarse a nuevas realidades, épocas, situaciones, etc. En este contexto un cambio a la Constitución es una enmienda.

7 0
3 years ago
One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws
liberstina [14]

Answer:

One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.

Martin Luther King Jr. said that.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When you park on a hill, think abou
    7·1 answer
  • Match each method for creating domestic policy with its definition.
    9·1 answer
  • Damages intended to punish a defendant and deter the defendant from engaging in the same tortuous conduct in the future are call
    14·1 answer
  • During your morning shift, you observe a motorist traveling 40 mph in a 15 mph school zone. You stop the vehicle, and the motori
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • Roles of the traditional rulurs chief in Ghana during the colonial period ?
    11·1 answer
  • Which act could be considered an acceptance of the social contract?
    15·1 answer
  • Sanyukt Vakya kitne Prakar ke Hote Hain​
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·2 answers
  • Why should i care if the government has my information
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!