Answer:
20 more tons of pollution into the air, and Firm B will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air.
Explanation:
It is given that :
Amount of tons of pollutants emitted by the two firms A and B earlier = 100 tons
Cost of pollutants by firm A = $ 200 per ton of pollutions
Cost of pollutants by firm B = $ 100 per ton of pollutions
Since the cost for eliminating the pollutants into the air is more for the firm A, the ticket is also more valuable for firm A. And therefore, firm A will buy all the tickets form firm B for an amount around $ 101 to $ 199. It will do so as to have a positive consumer and also to produce surplus.
So firm A will eliminate 20 tons of pollution and will use 80 ton capacity from the tickets. And for firm B, it will eliminate all 100 tons of pollutions.
Answer: The correct answer is "D. the benefit of lower prices to be greater than the cost of reduced services and less convenience.".
Explanation: Consumers obviously consider the benefit of lower prices to be greater than the cost of reduced services and less convenience.
Discount and no-frills airlines have less costs to cover so they can offer lower and more affordable prices for consumers. These airlines have been successful because it turns out that consumers value or prefer the lower price rather than the additional services.
On Monday and Tuesday, the process appears to be out of control.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- There are five days Monday, Tuesday,Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Monday and Tuesday have weight up to 21. Wednesday weights up to 21.
- Thursday and Friday weigh up to 20. Except for Monday and Tuesday, all the days have packaged up to the value of 21. So Monday and Tuesday are the days that appear to be out of control.
- On checking the package for each day he came to know that Monday and Tuesday have process out of control.
Answer:
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.
Explanation:
It is provided that after cost overruns of the project is $10 million, which can never be recovered, thus, it is a kind of sunk cost.
Sunk cost is the cost which is made previously, and now in no manner will affect the decision, as cannot be recovered.
Therefore, such cost is ignored.
Further provided additional cost will be $12 million, therefore, now the society shall make a rational choice whether to continue the project providing solar electricity of $10 million, as in case of amount of solar energy is $32 million or $22 million, then the choice is obvious to accept,
Rational choice will be for solar electricity worth $10 million.
Therefore, correct statement is
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.
Answer:
True because in the case if the the company is producing single product then the method is simple. If the company is making number of products we have to assume a sales mix to calculate breakeven point. Reaching breakeven point is not easy in multi products case. To calculate breakeven point we have to calculate weighted average contribution per unit to put the values in the following formula:
Breakeven point (units) = Fixed cost/ weighted average cost per unit
