<span>Cesar Chavez by reading excerpts from "lessons of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr." wanted people to make a change in the society for the upliftment and betterment of farm workers so that they can have better living, better health facilities, better financial help from government and their civil rights be protected. Cesar Chavez was aware of the hardships faced by farm workers so he wanted a change in the society to improve treatment facilities, better pay and better working conditions for farm workers.</span>
The correct answer is letter C
Explanation: The most closely associated with being psychologically healthy is focusing on the self not needing others.
Answer:
The Charter of Virginia (✿╹◡╹)/
Explanation:
" The Virginia Company of London was a joint-stock company chartered by King James I in 1606 to establish a colony in North America. Such a venture allowed the Crown to reap the benefits of colonization—natural resources, new markets for English goods, leverage against the Spanish—without bearing the costs "
Answer: A. Institutional
Explanation: Kegan proposed that five or more stages are passed through as children grow or transcend into adulthood, the stages include; The INCOPORATIVE, IMPULSIVE, IMPERIAL, INTERPERSONAL and INSTITUTIONAL STAGE. with the incorporate stage being the earliest and the institutional stage being the last stage discussed by Kegan. Kegan described the institutional stage as the point or time when a child starts to develop behavioral principles, values, ideas, make commitments and nurture principles guiding their actions. At this point an individual starts to define and commit personalized attributes, behavior and personal set standard. This is as pointed out in the scenario above where Zach is said to have be one too strident in his opinion. This means that Zach now has committed to his own personalized value and guiding principle.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Argue a case for appointing judges and then argue a case for having them elected.
In the case of appointing judges, many experts agree on the idea that appointed is better because judges have to be neutral. They serve the Constitution, they do not serve any political party or particular interests.
Once appointed, the judges are going to ratify, so it is supposed that their integrity is double-checked.
In other cases, some arguments favor the election of judges, stating that people should be trusted to elect judges. Through this election, judges will be driven to serve the people who put their trust in them to impart justice.
If they are elected, some voices agree that judges should be elected for a determined period, so people could evaluate if they did a good during their tenure.
However, in both cases, some advantages and disadvantages have to be resolved by law experts and politicians in their respective states.
